Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 25 167441 NNY 17 CD
40 Esther Shiner Blvd; 1001 Sheppard Ave E
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 29 May 2025
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 40 Esther Shiner Blvd; 1001 Sheppard Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Submitted
- 29 May 2025
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 990 units
- Related file
- 19 155827 NNY 17 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Standard Condominium application for 19-storey and 31-storey buildings with a total of 990 residential units, 1080 parking spaces. This is known as Concord Park Place. Associated site plan control application 19 155827 NNY 17 SA.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Concord AdexSM31902 · 24 June 2021 · “1001 Sheppard Avenue East”
- Concord AdexSM31902 · 24 June 2021 · “40 Esther Shiner Boulevard”
- Concord AdexSM31948 · 21 June 2021 · “1001 Sheppard Avenue East”
- Concord AdexSM31948 · 21 June 2021 · “40 Esther Shiner Blvd”
- Concord AdexSM22751 · 3 February 2016 · “1001 Sheppard Avenue East”
- Concord AdexSM22753 · 3 February 2016 · “1001 Sheppard Avenue East”
- Concord AdexSM22755 · 3 February 2016 · “1001 Sheppard Avenue East”
- Concord Adex Developments LimitedSM15225 · 6 October 2010 · “1001 Sheppard Ave East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.