lobbyTO

Registration SM36247 · consultant

Regency Property Inc.

Status: closed8 January 2025 to 8 January 2026Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
19
2 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
1
Published links only
Linked applications
1
Published links only

Who

Client
Regency Property Inc.
Consultant firm
Bousfields Inc.
Registrant
Karla Tamayo
Type
consultant
Status
closed
Dates
Approved 8 January 2025; 8 January 2025 to 8 January 2026

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application
  • Planning and Development Application, Official Plan
  • Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

104-114 Finch Avenue East proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application.

Addresses named: 104-114 Finch Avenue E. (Ward 18)

Automated summary of the registration text

Registered, communicating about 104-114 Finch Avenue East proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application.

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2025-01 to 2025-05

19 communications, most in 2025-02 (8)

How and with whom

By method · 10 meetings

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

Offices contacted· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Lily ChengCouncillor staff1154 March 2025
Lily ChengMember of council8515 May 2025
All communications· 19 rows
19 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
15 May 2025Ward 18 WillowdaleLily Cheng
Member of council
Lily ChengMeeting
Meeting;Other:site visit
—
4 March 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengMeeting—
3 March 2025Ward 18 WillowdaleLily Cheng
Member of council
Lily ChengMeeting—
3 March 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengMeeting—
12 February 2025Ward 18 WillowdaleLily Cheng
Member of council
Lily ChengMeeting—
12 February 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengMeeting—
6 February 2025Ward 18 WillowdaleLily Cheng
Member of council
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—
6 February 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—
5 February 2025Ward 18 WillowdaleLily Cheng
Member of council
Lily ChengMeeting—
5 February 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengMeeting—
4 February 2025Ward 18 WillowdaleLily Cheng
Member of council
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—
4 February 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—
31 January 2025Ward 18 WillowdaleLily Cheng
Member of council
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—
31 January 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—
30 January 2025Ward 18 WillowdaleLily Cheng
Member of council
Lily ChengMeeting—
30 January 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengMeeting—
15 January 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Atefeh Javadian
Councillor staff
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—
10 January 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Saham Abdi
Councillor staff
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—
8 January 2025Office of Councillor Cheng, Ward 18Saham Abdi
Councillor staff
Lily ChengEmail
E-mail
—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

This link is inferred by lobbyTO; the registry does not record which agenda item a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored