lobbyTO

Registration SM31167 · consultant

Phantom Developments Limited

Status: closed by lro22 January 2021 to 1 September 2021Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
1
Published links only

Who

Client
Phantom Developments Limited
Consultant firm
Mihevc Consulting and Mediation
Registrant
Joe Mihevc
Type
consultant
Status
closed by lro
Dates
Approved 22 January 2021; 22 January 2021 to 1 September 2021

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

Support for a development application at 2-6 Teagarden Crt

Addresses named: 2-6 Teagarden Crt (Ward 18)

Automated summary of the registration text

Registered, communicating about support for a development application at 2-6 Teagarden Crt

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2021-01 to 2021-01

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 0 meetings

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Councillor FilionCouncillor staff1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor FilionCouncillor staff1026 January 2021
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
26 January 2021Councillor FilionCatherine LeBlanc Miller
Councillor staff
—Call
Telephone
—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored