lobbyTO

Registration SM23999 · consultant

H & R Developments

Status: closed6 February 2017 to 5 February 2018Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
1
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
1
Published links only

Who

Client
H & R Developments
Consultant firm
Goldberg Group
Registrant
Janice Robinson
Type
consultant
Status
closed
Dates
Approved 6 February 2017; 6 February 2017 to 5 February 2018

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application, Site Plan

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

To discuss the development proposal for the property of 41 Antrim Crescent

Addresses named: 41 Antrim Cres (Ward 21)

Automated summary of the registration text

Registered to discuss the development proposal for the property of 41 Antrim Crescent

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2017-02 to 2017-02

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 1 meeting

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1113 February 2017
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
13 February 2017Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtNorm Kelly
Member of council
—Meeting—

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored