lobbyTO

Registration SM23535 · in-house

Cedar City Developments

Status: closed25 September 2016 to 31 May 2022Source datasetReport an error on this page
Communications
1
1 offices contacted
Lobbyists
2
Linked agenda items
0
Published links only
Linked applications
2
Published links only

Who

Client
Cedar City Developments
Registrant
Steven Silverberg
Type
in-house
Status
closed
Dates
Approved 5 October 2016; 25 September 2016 to 31 May 2022

Subject matter

  • Planning and Development Application, Site Plan
  • Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance

Source: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry (open data). Dataset page.

Particulars

240 & 250 Alton Towers Circle

Addresses named: 240 & 250 Alton Towers Circle (Ward 23)

Automated summary of the registration text

Registered regarding 240 & 250 Alton Towers Circle

Generated from the registration text only. Read the particulars for the registrant's own words.

Lobbyists

Organisations named

Communications

Communications per month

2020-04 to 2020-04

1 communication

How and with whom

By method · 0 meetings

By office holder

Most-contacted offices

  • BuildingCity staff1
Offices contacted· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
BuildingCity staff101 April 2020
All communications· 1 row
1 communications recorded
DateOfficeOffice holder (as recorded)Member's officeMethodLobbyist
1 April 2020Building—
City staff
—Email
E-mail
Steven Silverberg

"Member's office" is the member of council whose office was contacted (the member or their staff), resolved from the office holder name and office recorded in the registry.

Linked agenda items

No published links to agenda items.

Linked development applications

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored