lobbyTO

Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A1100/18TEY

465-467 Vaughan Rd

Status
Closed
Refused
Submitted
20 November 2018
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
17
8 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Minor variance (MV)
Addresses
465-467 Vaughan Rd
Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted
20 November 2018
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Refused
Hearing date
6 March 2019
Decision
Refused
Objection at the hearing
Yes
Appealed
Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To construct a three-storey freehold townhouse with an integral garage and third storey front balcony as described in Consent Application B0105/18TEY.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 17 communications · 8 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 21 St. Paul's9
  • Office of Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 218
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 21 St. Paul'sMember of council9621 February 2018
Office of Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21Councillor staff8221 February 2018

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 12

20 lobbied · 357 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied106
  • Matched, unlobbied145

Approval rate

  • Lobbied50% n=12
  • Matched, unlobbied90% n=291

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied50%
  • Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied35%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied86%
  • Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12: 20 lobbied and 357 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2010650% (n=12)50%35%86%
Matched, unlobbied35714590% (n=291)10%5%30%
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.