Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0970/23TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 1 November 2023
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 386-394 Symington Avenue
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 1 November 2023
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 17 January 2024
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To alter the development standards for a residential building approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 1156-2022(OLT), as amended under City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013, by increasing the height and floor space index and reducing the number of parking spaces.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
TRICON Residential · registration SM34585
394 Symington Ave Minor Variance -COA. Seeking additional height and density.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34585: 394 Symington Ave Minor Variance -COA. Seeking additional height and density. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0970/23TEY at 386-394 Symington Ave: To alter the development standards for a residential building approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 1156-2022(OLT), as amended under City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013, by increasing the height and floor space index and reducing the number of parking spaces. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 394 Symington Ave Minor Variance -COA. Seeking additional height and density.
Matched fields
- address
- 394 SYMINGTON AVE
- application_address
- 386-394 SYMINGTON AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- The Symington Holdings Ltd.SM22595 · 21 December 2015 · “386-394 Symington Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.