Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0597/23TEY
- Status
- TLAB Appeal
- Approved
- Submitted
- 29 June 2023
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 316 Bloor St W
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 29 June 2023
- Status
- TLAB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 13 December 2023
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- Yes
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To alter the development standards (as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 595-2021(OLT), as amended by City Wide By-law 569-2013), for a new mixed-use building.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
State Building Group · registration SM35261
Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM35261: Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0597/23TEY at 316 Bloor St W: To alter the development standards (as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 595-2021(OLT), as amended by City Wide By-law 569-2013), for a new mixed-use building. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval.
Matched fields
- address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
State Building Group · registration SM35219
Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM35219: Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0597/23TEY at 316 Bloor St W: To alter the development standards (as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 595-2021(OLT), as amended by City Wide By-law 569-2013), for a new mixed-use building. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval.
Matched fields
- address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 34 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Saxe | Councillor staff | 23 | 1 | 26 July 2024 |
| Dianne Saxe | Member of council | 11 | 0 | 26 July 2024 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 316 Bloor West Toronto Developments Ltd.SM22911 · 1 January 2016 · “316 Bloor St West”
- State Building GroupSM20213 · 26 March 2014 · “316 Bloor Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.