Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
316 Bloor St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66709, -79.40306
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Saxe | Councillor staff | 23 | 1 | 26 July 2024 |
| Dianne Saxe | Member of council | 12 | 0 | 26 July 2024 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 24 April 2017 |
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 26 November 2019 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35261 | State Building Group | 316 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 29 January 2024 – 31 December 2024 | 10 |
| SM35219 | State Building Group | 316 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 17 January 2024 – 31 December 2024 | 24 |
| SM22911 | 316 Bloor West Toronto Developments Ltd. | 316 Bloor St West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla… | 1 January 2016 – 31 December 2020 | 3 |
| SM20213 | State Building Group | 316 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium | 26 March 2014 – 31 December 2026 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 29 June 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0597/23TEYTLAB Appeal · Approved
- Submitted 28 June 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 182137 STE 20 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 26 January 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 108641 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0597/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 29 June 2023 | TLAB Appeal Approved |
| 16 182137 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 June 2016 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 15 108641 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 January 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
316 Bloor St W · Minor variance (MV)
A0597/23TEY · submitted 29 June 2023 · TLAB Appeal · from registration SM35219 (State Building Group)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM35219: Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0597/23TEY at 316 Bloor St W: To alter the development standards (as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 595-2021(OLT), as amended by City Wide By-law 569-2013), for a new mixed-use building. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval.
Matched fields
- address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
316 Bloor St W · Minor variance (MV)
A0597/23TEY · submitted 29 June 2023 · TLAB Appeal · from registration SM35261 (State Building Group)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM35261: Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0597/23TEY at 316 Bloor St W: To alter the development standards (as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 595-2021(OLT), as amended by City Wide By-law 569-2013), for a new mixed-use building. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed City Appeal of 316 Bloor Street West Committee of Adjustment Approval.
Matched fields
- address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
316 Bloor St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 182137 STE 20 SA · submitted 28 June 2016 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM22911 (316 Bloor West Toronto Developments Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22911: Request zoning changes for 316 Bloor St West, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 182137 STE 20 SA at 316 Bloor St W: Site Plan application for a 36-storey mixed use building including at grade commercial space and 499 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Request zoning changes for 316 Bloor St West, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 316 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.