Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0318/21TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Withdrawn
- Submitted
- 5 March 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 155 Wychwood Ave
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 5 March 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Withdrawn
- Hearing date
- —
- Decision
- Withdrawn
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct an eight-storey mixed-use building consisting of ground level retail, 29 residential units above ground and 22 below grade parking spaces.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Thomas Tsui · registration SM30365
Reated to a development application at 155 Wychwood Ave
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30365: Reated to a development application at 155 Wychwood Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0318/21TEY at 155 Wychwood Ave: To construct an eight-storey mixed-use building consisting of ground level retail, 29 residential units above ground and 22 below grade parking spaces. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Reated to a development application at 155 Wychwood Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 155 WYCHWOOD AVE
- application_address
- 155 WYCHWOOD AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 17 July 2020 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Colliers Project LeadersSM29935 · 1 April 2020 · “155 Wychwood Avenue.”
- Colliers Project LeadersSM29936 · 1 April 2020 · “155 Wychwood Avenue.”
- Stanton RenaissanceSM22185 · 31 August 2015 · “155 Wychwood Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.