Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
155 Wychwood Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.68250, -79.42304
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 11 May 2017 |
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 17 July 2020 |
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 6 April 2020 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM29935 | Colliers Project Leaders | 155 Wychwood Avenue. | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Heritage | 1 April 2020 – 1 October 2020 | 1 |
| SM29936 | Colliers Project Leaders | 155 Wychwood Avenue. | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Heritage | 1 April 2020 – 13 October 2020 | 1 |
| SM30365 | Thomas Tsui | 155 Wychwood Ave | Planning and Development Application | 1 March 2020 – 1 June 2022 | 2 |
| SM22185 | Stanton Renaissance | 155 Wychwood Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 31 August 2015 – 31 December 2017 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 5 March 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0318/21TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 8 June 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 153714 STE 12 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 30 December 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1349/19TEYClosed · Withdrawn
- Submitted 2 December 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 258974 STE 21 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0318/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 March 2021 | Closed Withdrawn |
| 20 153714 STE 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 June 2020 | Under Review In progress |
| A1349/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 30 December 2019 | Closed Withdrawn |
| 14 258974 STE 21 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 December 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
155 Wychwood Ave · Minor variance (MV)
A0318/21TEY · submitted 5 March 2021 · Closed · from registration SM30365 (Thomas Tsui)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30365: Reated to a development application at 155 Wychwood Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0318/21TEY at 155 Wychwood Ave: To construct an eight-storey mixed-use building consisting of ground level retail, 29 residential units above ground and 22 below grade parking spaces. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Reated to a development application at 155 Wychwood Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 155 WYCHWOOD AVE
- application_address
- 155 WYCHWOOD AVE
155 Wychwood Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 153714 STE 12 SA · submitted 8 June 2020 · Under Review · from registration SM30365 (Thomas Tsui)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM30365: Reated to a development application at 155 Wychwood Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 153714 STE 12 SA at 155 Wychwood Ave: INACTIVE July 2022 Revised Proposal: a 8-storey mixed-use building containing 204.24 square metres of non-residential gross floor area and 3143.86 square metres of residential gross floor area, with one underground level. A total of 39 residential dwelling units, 16 vehicular parking spaces, and 84… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Reated to a development application at 155 Wychwood Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 155 WYCHWOOD AVE
- application_address
- 155 WYCHWOOD AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | 511 | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.