Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0250/21TEY
- Status
- TLAB Appeal
- Approved
- Submitted
- 28 February 2021
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 6 Nassau St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 28 February 2021
- Status
- TLAB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 22 June 2022
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- Yes
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct five four-storey townhouse dwellings.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
9115951 CANADA INC. · registration SM30756
Proposed residential infill development of property located at 6 Nassau Street. An application for Site Plan Control has been submitted. It is anticipated that an application for Minor Variance will …
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30756: Proposed residential infill development of property located at 6 Nassau Street. An application for Site Plan Control has been submitted. It is anticipated that an application for Minor Variance will be submitted at a future date. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0250/21TEY at 6 Nassau St: To construct five four-storey townhouse dwellings. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed residential infill development of property located at 6 Nassau Street. An application for Site Plan Control has been submitted. It is anticipated that an application for Minor Variance will …
Matched fields
- address
- 6 NASSAU ST
- application_address
- 6 NASSAU ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Evertrust DevelopmentSM26566 · 29 November 2018 · “6 Nassau Street”
- Evertrust Development Group CanadaSM27106 · 29 November 2018 · “6 Nassau Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.