Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
6 Nassau St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.65606, -79.40012
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 8 | 3 | 11 February 2022 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 29 November 2018 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30756 | 9115951 CANADA INC. | 6 Nassau Street. | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 26 October 2020 – 26 October 2021 | 0 |
| SM26566 | Evertrust Development | 6 Nassau Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 29 November 2018 – 28 November 2019 | 1 |
| SM27106 | Evertrust Development Group Canada | 6 Nassau Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 29 November 2018 – 1 February 2023 | 9 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 28 February 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0250/21TEYTLAB Appeal · Approved
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0250/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 28 February 2021 | TLAB Appeal Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
6 Nassau St · Minor variance (MV)
A0250/21TEY · submitted 28 February 2021 · TLAB Appeal · from registration SM30756 (9115951 CANADA INC.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30756: Proposed residential infill development of property located at 6 Nassau Street. An application for Site Plan Control has been submitted. It is anticipated that an application for Minor Variance will be submitted at a future date. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0250/21TEY at 6 Nassau St: To construct five four-storey townhouse dwellings. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed residential infill development of property located at 6 Nassau Street. An application for Site Plan Control has been submitted. It is anticipated that an application for Minor Variance will …
Matched fields
- address
- 6 NASSAU ST
- application_address
- 6 NASSAU ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.