Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0205/20NY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 6 May 2020
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 1185 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Submitted
- 6 May 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 20 August 2020
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To legalize and maintain the 111 parking spaces, of 644, that are deficient in width.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Lindvest Properties Limited · registration SM26200
1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26200: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0205/20NY at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: To legalize and maintain the 111 parking spaces, of 644, that are deficient in width. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 26 Don Valley West | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 10 May 2018 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- LindvestSM26563 · 27 July 2018 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Lindvest Properties LimitedSM25667 · 16 February 2018 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Lindvest Properties LimitedSM23356 · 19 July 2016 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Independent Order of ForestersSM19125 · 22 March 2013 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East.”
- Norma WaltonSM15304 · 28 October 2010 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Skyline 1185 Eglinton Avenue Inc.SM11195 · 11 February 2008 · “1185 Eglinton Avenue East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 16
5 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.