Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
1185 Eglinton Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Location
- 43.71982, -79.33682
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
7These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 26 Don Valley West | Member of council | 12 | 5 | 10 May 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Minnan-Wong, Ward 16 | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 7 January 2020 |
| Ward 16 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 28 November 2019 |
All registrations· 7 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM26563 | Lindvest | 1185 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 27 July 2018 – 26 July 2019 | 0 |
| SM26200 | Lindvest Properties Limited | 1185 Eglinton Avenue East | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance; Transportation - Roads / Br… | 10 May 2018 – 9 May 2019 | 1 |
| SM25667 | Lindvest Properties Limited | 1185 Eglinton Avenue East | Building Permits; Transportation - Roads / Bridges | 16 February 2018 – 10 May 2018 | 1 |
| SM23356 | Lindvest Properties Limited | 1185 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 19 July 2016 – 9 June 2020 | 2 |
| SM19125 | Independent Order of Foresters | 1185 Eglinton Avenue East. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 22 March 2013 – 19 December 2021 | 9 |
| SM15304 | Norma Walton | 1185 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 28 October 2010 – 8 July 2014 | 4 |
| SM11195 | Skyline 1185 Eglinton Avenue Inc. | 1185 Eglinton Avenue East | Planning Application - Zoning By-law Amendment | 11 February 2008 – 1 November 2010 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 15 May 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 145737 NNY 16 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 6 May 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0205/20NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 10 May 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0368/18NYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 May 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 159786 NNY 26 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 May 2015Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 15 159976 NNY 26 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 February 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 111649 NNY 26 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 145737 NNY 16 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 15 May 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0205/20NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 May 2020 | Closed Approved |
| A0368/18NY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 10 May 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 15 159786 NNY 26 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 May 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 159976 NNY 26 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 20 May 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 111649 NNY 26 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 14 February 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1185 Eglinton Ave E · Minor variance (MV)
A0205/20NY · submitted 6 May 2020 · Closed · from registration SM26200 (Lindvest Properties Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26200: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0205/20NY at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: To legalize and maintain the 111 parking spaces, of 644, that are deficient in width. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
1185 Eglinton Ave E · Minor variance (MV)
A0368/18NY · submitted 10 May 2018 · Closed · from registration SM26200 (Lindvest Properties Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26200: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0368/18NY at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: To amend Site-Specific Zoning By-law 1183-2016 to permit minor design revisions to the previously approved 28 and 29-storey condominium towers. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
1185 Eglinton Ave E · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
15 159976 NNY 26 SB · submitted 20 May 2015 · Closed · from registration SM19125 (Independent Order of Foresters)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19125: Proposed development applications to permit a residential building on the lands municipally known as 1185 Eglinton Avenue East. Appeals of OPA No. 231 and OPA No. 238; OPA No. 404 and Heritage matter (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 159976 NNY 26 SB at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: This application is for a draft plan of subdivision and site plan control to permit two residential apartment buildings of 28 and 30 storeys for a total of 612 dwelling units. Also proposed are an additional 26 three-storey townhouse units. There are a total of 632 parking spaces proposed with 537 … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed development applications to permit a residential building on the lands municipally known as 1185 Eglinton Avenue East. Appeals of OPA No. 231 and OPA No. 238; OPA No. 404 and Heritage matter
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
1185 Eglinton Ave E · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
15 159976 NNY 26 SB · submitted 20 May 2015 · Closed · from registration SM23356 (Lindvest Properties Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23356: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 159976 NNY 26 SB at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: This application is for a draft plan of subdivision and site plan control to permit two residential apartment buildings of 28 and 30 storeys for a total of 612 dwelling units. Also proposed are an additional 26 three-storey townhouse units. There are a total of 632 parking spaces proposed with 537 … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
1185 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 111649 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 14 February 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11195 (Skyline 1185 Eglinton Avenue Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11195: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 111649 NNY 26 OZ at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: This application is to permit the development of two apartment buildings 28 and 30 storeys in height and 26 townhouses for a total of 639 units and an FSI of 4.35 on the site of an existing office building and surface parking lot. The office building has been demolished. The applicant appealed to t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
1185 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 111649 NNY 26 OZ · submitted 14 February 2008 · Closed · from registration SM15304 (Norma Walton)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15304: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 111649 NNY 26 OZ at 1185 Eglinton Ave E: This application is to permit the development of two apartment buildings 28 and 30 storeys in height and 26 townhouses for a total of 639 units and an FSI of 4.35 on the site of an existing office building and surface parking lot. The office building has been demolished. The applicant appealed to t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1185 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 1185 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 16
5 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16
10 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 16
2 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.