Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0132/19SC
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 13 May 2019
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 2217 Kingston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 13 May 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 25 July 2019
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To permit a six-storey mixed use building containing a healing lodge and transitional housing with retail space on the ground floor. A healing lodge is a Residential Care Facility that provides a culturally-relevant, restorative care setting to aid Indigenous women who are making a transition from the correctional system into the community. The proposed healing lodge would include twelve residences and gathering spaces for cultural programming. More information about this proposal, including details about the cultural programming proposed by the Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society, are available online at the Application Information Centre at www.toronto.ca/aic.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society · registration SM28307
Application for a healing lodge at 2217 Kingston Road in Scarborough
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28307: Application for a healing lodge at 2217 Kingston Road in Scarborough (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0132/19SC at 2217 Kingston Rd: To permit a six-storey mixed use building containing a healing lodge and transitional housing with retail space on the ground floor. A healing lodge is a Residential Care Facility that provides a culturally-relevant, restorative care setting to aid Indigenous women who are making a transition from … (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application for a healing lodge at 2217 Kingston Road in Scarborough
Matched fields
- address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society · registration SM28237
City Support for Minor Variance and funding for an affordable housing project at 2217 Kingston Rd.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28237: City Support for Minor Variance and funding for an affordable housing project at 2217 Kingston Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0132/19SC at 2217 Kingston Rd: To permit a six-storey mixed use building containing a healing lodge and transitional housing with retail space on the ground floor. A healing lodge is a Residential Care Facility that provides a culturally-relevant, restorative care setting to aid Indigenous women who are making a transition from … (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: City Support for Minor Variance and funding for an affordable housing project at 2217 Kingston Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 3 communications · 3 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Crawford | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 10 June 2019 |
| Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 10 June 2019 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Thunder Woman Healing LodgeSM31846 · 15 June 2021 · “2217 Kingston Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 20
9 lobbied · 295 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 295 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.