Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
2217 Kingston Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.70372, -79.25259
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 18 June 2021 |
| Gary Crawford | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 10 June 2019 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM31846 | Thunder Woman Healing Lodge | 2217 Kingston Road | Affordable Housing; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 15 June 2021 – 1 October 2021 | 2 |
| SM28307 | Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society | 2217 Kingston Road | Affordable Housing; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 7 June 2019 – 30 July 2019 | 3 |
| SM28237 | Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society | 2217 Kingston Rd. | Affordable Housing | 27 May 2019 – 30 April 2020 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 29 June 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0137/22SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 17 February 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 117870 ESC 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 May 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0132/19SCClosed · Approved
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0137/22SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 29 June 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 21 117870 ESC 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 17 February 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0132/19SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 May 2019 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2217 Kingston Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 117870 ESC 20 SA · submitted 17 February 2021 · Closed · from registration SM31846 (Thunder Woman Healing Lodge)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31846: Site plan application for 2217 Kingston Road, Scarborough (Thunder Woman Healing Lodge) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 117870 ESC 20 SA at 2217 Kingston Rd: The proposal is for a seven-storey mixed use building containing a healing lodge and transitional housing with retail. The proposal has been granted funding under the City of Toronto's Open Door program. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site plan application for 2217 Kingston Road, Scarborough (Thunder Woman Healing Lodge)
Matched fields
- address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
2217 Kingston Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0132/19SC · submitted 13 May 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28237 (Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28237: City Support for Minor Variance and funding for an affordable housing project at 2217 Kingston Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0132/19SC at 2217 Kingston Rd: To permit a six-storey mixed use building containing a healing lodge and transitional housing with retail space on the ground floor. A healing lodge is a Residential Care Facility that provides a culturally-relevant, restorative care setting to aid Indigenous women who are making a transition from … (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: City Support for Minor Variance and funding for an affordable housing project at 2217 Kingston Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
2217 Kingston Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0132/19SC · submitted 13 May 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28307 (Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28307: Application for a healing lodge at 2217 Kingston Road in Scarborough (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0132/19SC at 2217 Kingston Rd: To permit a six-storey mixed use building containing a healing lodge and transitional housing with retail space on the ground floor. A healing lodge is a Residential Care Facility that provides a culturally-relevant, restorative care setting to aid Indigenous women who are making a transition from … (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application for a healing lodge at 2217 Kingston Road in Scarborough
Matched fields
- address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 2217 KINGSTON RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 20
9 lobbied · 295 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 295 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.