Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0072/26EYK
- Status
- Deferred
- In progress
- Submitted
- 17 February 2026
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 63 Station Rd
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 17 February 2026
- Status
- Deferred
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Hearing date
- —
- Decision
- Deferred
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To convert the existing building under construction into an apartment building containing 6 dwelling units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Gabrielle Schachter · registration SM37546
Oppose Committee of Adjustment application for 63 Station Road A0072/26EYK
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM37546: Oppose Committee of Adjustment application for 63 Station Road A0072/26EYK (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0072/26EYK at 63 Station Rd: To convert the existing building under construction into an apartment building containing 6 dwelling units. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Oppose Committee of Adjustment application for 63 Station Road A0072/26EYK
- particulars: Oppose Committee of Adjustment application for 63 Station Road A0072/26EYK
Matched fields
- file_number
- A0072/26EYK
- address
- 63 STATION RD
- application_address
- 63 STATION RD
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 13 April 2026 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 3
4 lobbied · 265 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 265 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.