Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley

63 Station Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 2; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 1; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Location: 43.61571, -79.49423
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Gabrielle SchachterSM37546 · 8 April 20262

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Amber Morley2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Amber Morley	Member of council	2	0	13 April 2026

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM37546	Gabrielle Schachter	63 Station Road	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application	8 April 2026 – 24 April 2026	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 17 February 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0072/26EYKDeferred · In progress

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
A0072/26EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	17 February 2026	Deferred In progress

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

63 Station Rd · Minor variance (MV)
A0072/26EYK · submitted 17 February 2026 · Deferred · from registration SM37546 (Gabrielle Schachter)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM37546: Oppose Committee of Adjustment application for 63 Station Road A0072/26EYK (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0072/26EYK at 63 Station Rd: To convert the existing building under construction into an apartment building containing 6 dwelling units. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Oppose Committee of Adjustment application for 63 Station Road A0072/26EYK
- particulars: Oppose Committee of Adjustment application for 63 Station Road A0072/26EYK
Matched fields
file_number
A0072/26EYK
address
63 STATION RD
application_address
63 STATION RD
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 3

4 lobbied · 265 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 3: 4 lobbied and 265 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	265	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.