Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 24 235688 WET 02 OZ

Ward 2 · Stephen HolydayDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 6 November 2024; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 4; 4 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 Eva Rd
Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted: 6 November 2024
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 936 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposed application to permit the redevelopment of the Subject Site with a new mixed-use development consisting of three residential towers atop a shared building podium. Community uses are proposed at grade along a north-south private road. The three towers, 28, 28, and 44 storeys in height, would sit atop a shared, 7-storey podium, containing a total of 936 residential units of both condominium and rental tenure.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Broccolini Construction (Toronto) Inc. · registration SM35249
Discussions with staff and the councillor for a for a rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of an office site located at 1 Eva Road into a residential development in a mixed use area under…
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35249: Discussions with staff and the councillor for a for a rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of an office site located at 1 Eva Road into a residential development in a mixed use area under the Official Plan. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 235688 WET 02 OZ at 1 Eva Rd: Proposed application to permit the redevelopment of the Subject Site with a new mixed-use development consisting of three residential towers atop a shared building podium. Community uses are proposed at grade along a north-south private road. The three towers, 28, 28, and 44 storeys in height, woul… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …with staff and the councillor for a for a rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of an office site located at 1 Eva Road into a residential development in a mixed use area under the Official Plan.
Matched fields
address
1 EVA RD
application_address
1 EVA RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 4 communications · 4 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Stephen Holyday4

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Stephen Holyday	Member of council	4	4	22 January 2024

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.