1 Eva Rd

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 4; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 1; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Location: 43.63947, -79.56307
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Broccolini Construction (Toronto) Inc.SM35249 · 22 January 20244

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Stephen Holyday4

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Stephen Holyday	Member of council	4	4	22 January 2024

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM35249	Broccolini Construction (Toronto) Inc.	1 Eva Road	Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	22 January 2024 – 31 December 2026	4

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 6 November 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 235688 WET 02 OZUnder Review · In progress

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
24 235688 WET 02 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	6 November 2024	Under Review In progress

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

1 Eva Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
24 235688 WET 02 OZ · submitted 6 November 2024 · Under Review · from registration SM35249 (Broccolini Construction (Toronto) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35249: Discussions with staff and the councillor for a for a rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of an office site located at 1 Eva Road into a residential development in a mixed use area under the Official Plan. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 235688 WET 02 OZ at 1 Eva Rd: Proposed application to permit the redevelopment of the Subject Site with a new mixed-use development consisting of three residential towers atop a shared building podium. Community uses are proposed at grade along a north-south private road. The three towers, 28, 28, and 44 storeys in height, woul… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …with staff and the councillor for a for a rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of an office site located at 1 Eva Road into a residential development in a mixed use area under the Official Plan.
Matched fields
address
1 EVA RD
application_address
1 EVA RD

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.