Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 24 109939 STE 13 SA
- Status
- Appeal Received
- In progress
- Submitted
- 30 January 2024
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 68 Wellesley St E
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 30 January 2024
- Status
- Appeal Received
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 258 units; 17,523 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 24 109932 STE 13 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approval for a 28 storey, mixed-use building with a total of 17,523.3 m2 of gross floor area, comprised of 16,903.4 m2 of residential GFA and 619.9 m2 of non-residential GFA. Approximately 258 residential dwelling units are proposed.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
ONE Properties · registration SM34215
64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34215: 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 109939 STE 13 SA at 68 Wellesley St E: Site Plan Approval for a 28 storey, mixed-use building with a total of 17,523.3 m2 of gross floor area, comprised of 16,903.4 m2 of residential GFA and 619.9 m2 of non-residential GFA. Approximately 258 residential dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street
Matched fields
- address
- 552-570 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 68 WELLESLEY ST E
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Moise | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 13 March 2023 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Tercot Capital IncorporatedSM22585 · 18 December 2015 · “68 Wellesley Street East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.