Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
68 Wellesley St E
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66592, -79.38066
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22585 | Tercot Capital Incorporated | 68 Wellesley Street East | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 18 December 2015 – 31 December 2016 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 30 January 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 109932 STE 13 OZOMB Refused · Refused
- Submitted 30 January 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 109939 STE 13 SAAppeal Received · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 109932 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 January 2024 | OMB Refused Refused |
| 24 109939 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 January 2024 | Appeal Received In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
68 Wellesley St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
24 109939 STE 13 SA · submitted 30 January 2024 · Appeal Received · from registration SM34215 (ONE Properties)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34215: 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 109939 STE 13 SA at 68 Wellesley St E: Site Plan Approval for a 28 storey, mixed-use building with a total of 17,523.3 m2 of gross floor area, comprised of 16,903.4 m2 of residential GFA and 619.9 m2 of non-residential GFA. Approximately 258 residential dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street
Matched fields
- address
- 552-570 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 68 WELLESLEY ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
- 68 Wellesley Street East - Refusal of Application for Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties Under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act2024.PB16.13 · 28 March 2024
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.