Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)

Development application 23 172397 ESC 21 SB

1 Rannock St; 9 Craigton Dr; 15 Craigton Dr; 19 Craigton Dr; 23 Craigton Dr; 32 Craigton Dr; 40 Craigton Dr; 860 Pharmacy Ave

Ward 21 · Michael ThompsonDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 10 July 2023; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 6; 2 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Addresses: 1 Rannock St; 9 Craigton Dr; 15 Craigton Dr; 19 Craigton Dr; 23 Craigton Dr; 32 Craigton Dr; 40 Craigton Dr; 860 Pharmacy Ave
Ward: Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Submitted: 10 July 2023
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 23 172335 ESC 21 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Subdivision application for the lands at 860 Pharmacy Ave, 9-23 and 32-40 Craigton Dr, and 1 Rannock St (Starlight lands) to create three (3) development blocks, including one block for public parkland, and a new public street. This application is related to Official Plan Amendment Application No. 19 251045 ESC 21 OZ and Zoning By-law Amendment Application No. 23 172335 ESC 21 OZ.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Starlight Investments · registration SM32721
Communication on the Planning Application submitted for 1 Rannock St., 860 Pharmacy Ave., 9, 15, 19, 23, 32 and 40 Craigton Drive
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32721: Communication on the Planning Application submitted for 1 Rannock St., 860 Pharmacy Ave., 9, 15, 19, 23, 32 and 40 Craigton Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 172397 ESC 21 SB at 9 Craigton Dr: Draft Plan of Subdivision application for the lands at 860 Pharmacy Ave, 9-23 and 32-40 Craigton Dr, and 1 Rannock St (Starlight lands) to create three (3) development blocks, including one block for public parkland, and a new public street. This application is related to Official Plan Amendment Ap… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Communication on the Planning Application submitted for 1 Rannock St., 860 Pharmacy Ave., 9, 15, 19, 23, 32 and 40 Craigton Drive
Matched fields
address
1 RANNOCK ST
application_address
1 RANNOCK ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 6 communications · 2 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor Michael Thompson4
Mayor John Tory1
Ward 21 Scarborough Centre1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Michael Thompson	Councillor staff	4	1	22 June 2022
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	1	0	21 April 2022
Ward 21 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	1	1	22 March 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amir Remtulla and Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Starlight Investments
SM36236 · 1 January 2025 · “1 Rannock St”
Starlight Investments
SM29111 · 4 November 2019 · “1 Rannock St”
Starlight Investments
SM29111 · 4 November 2019 · “40 Craigton Dr”
Starlight Investments
SM29111 · 4 November 2019 · “860 Pharmacy Ave”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 21

1 lobbied · 1 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 21: 1 lobbied and 1 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.