Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 23 140475 WET 03 SA
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Approved
- Submitted
- 28 April 2023
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 5359 Dundas St W
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 28 April 2023
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 571 units; 37,725 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 23 140448 WET 03 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
50-storey mixed-use building, 156.6 metres tall (excluding MPH), with 571 residential units (139 2-bedroom and 57 3-bedroom units), 37,725 square metres of Gross Floor Area, 252 vehicular parking spaces and 439 bicycle parking spaces.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
CentreCourt · registration SM35580
5359 Dundas St W
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35580: 5359 Dundas St W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 140475 WET 03 SA at 5359 Dundas St W: 50-storey mixed-use building, 156.6 metres tall (excluding MPH), with 571 residential units (139 2-bedroom and 57 3-bedroom units), 37,725 square metres of Gross Floor Area, 252 vehicular parking spaces and 439 bicycle parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5359 Dundas St W
Matched fields
- address
- 5359 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 5359 DUNDAS ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 26 November 2025 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.