Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
5359 Dundas St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.63576, -79.53991
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 26 November 2025 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35580 | CentreCourt | 5359 Dundas St W | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 14 May 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 10 June 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0181/26EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 2 May 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 140448 WET 03 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 April 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 140475 WET 03 SANOAC Issued · Approved
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0181/26EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 10 June 2026 | Closed Approved |
| 23 140448 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 2 May 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 23 140475 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 April 2023 | NOAC Issued Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5359 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 140448 WET 03 OZ · submitted 2 May 2023 · Closed · from registration SM35580 (CentreCourt)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35580: 5359 Dundas St W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 140448 WET 03 OZ at 5359 Dundas St W: Proposed redevelopment of the subject site with a 50-storey mixed-use building with a four-storey base building. The proposed gross floor area is 37,975 square metres, including 743 square metres of commercial space and 600 dwelling units, resulting in a floor space index of 10.88 times the lot are… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5359 Dundas St W
Matched fields
- address
- 5359 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 5359 DUNDAS ST W
5359 Dundas St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
23 140475 WET 03 SA · submitted 28 April 2023 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM35580 (CentreCourt)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35580: 5359 Dundas St W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 140475 WET 03 SA at 5359 Dundas St W: 50-storey mixed-use building, 156.6 metres tall (excluding MPH), with 571 residential units (139 2-bedroom and 57 3-bedroom units), 37,725 square metres of Gross Floor Area, 252 vehicular parking spaces and 439 bicycle parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5359 Dundas St W
Matched fields
- address
- 5359 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 5359 DUNDAS ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 3
4 lobbied · 265 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 265 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.