Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)

Development application 23 134682 WET 03 SB

21 Park Blvd; 31 Park Blvd; 220 Lake Promenade; 230 Lake Promenade; 240 Lake Promenade

Ward 3 · Amber MorleyDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Appeal; In progress
Submitted: 17 April 2023; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 8; 4 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Addresses: 21 Park Blvd; 31 Park Blvd; 220 Lake Promenade; 230 Lake Promenade; 240 Lake Promenade
Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted: 17 April 2023
Status: OMB Appeal
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes
Related file: 23 134668 WET 03 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan of Subdivision, 2 lots.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy · registration SM35573
Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35573: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 134682 WET 03 SB at 220 Lake Promenade: Draft Plan of Subdivision, 2 lots. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Matched fields
address
21&31 PARK BLVD
application_address
21 PARK BLVD
The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy · registration SM34641
Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34641: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 134682 WET 03 SB at 220 Lake Promenade: Draft Plan of Subdivision, 2 lots. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Matched fields
address
21&31 PARK BLVD
application_address
21 PARK BLVD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 8 communications · 4 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Amber Morley	Councillor staff	6	2	4 July 2024
Amber Morley	Member of council	2	2	4 July 2024

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Compten Management Inc.
SM23405 · 2 August 2016 · “31 Park Blvd.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3

1 lobbied · 1 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3: 1 lobbied and 1 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.