Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
31 Park Blvd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.59035, -79.53138
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Councillor staff | 6 | 2 | 4 July 2024 |
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 4 July 2024 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35573 | The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy | 31 Park Boulevard | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 10 May 2024 – 6 January 2025 | 4 |
| SM34641 | The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy | 31 Park Boulevard | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 13 July 2023 – 24 July 2025 | 4 |
| SM23405 | Compten Management Inc. | 31 Park Blvd. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 2 August 2016 – 1 August 2017 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 17 April 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 134668 WET 03 OZOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 17 April 2023Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 23 134682 WET 03 SBOMB Appeal · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 134668 WET 03 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 April 2023 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 23 134682 WET 03 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 17 April 2023 | OMB Appeal In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
31 Park Blvd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 134668 WET 03 OZ · submitted 17 April 2023 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM34641 (The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34641: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 134668 WET 03 OZ at 31 Park Blvd: The proposed Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion applications would provide for the phased demolition of the five existing 7-storey rental apartment buildings on the subject site, and would allow for the constructi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Matched fields
- address
- 21&31 PARK BLVD
- application_address
- 21 PARK BLVD
31 Park Blvd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
23 134668 WET 03 OZ · submitted 17 April 2023 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM35573 (The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM35573: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 134668 WET 03 OZ at 31 Park Blvd: The proposed Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion applications would provide for the phased demolition of the five existing 7-storey rental apartment buildings on the subject site, and would allow for the constructi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Matched fields
- address
- 21&31 PARK BLVD
- application_address
- 21 PARK BLVD
220 Lake Promenade · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
23 134682 WET 03 SB · submitted 17 April 2023 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM34641 (The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34641: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 134682 WET 03 SB at 220 Lake Promenade: Draft Plan of Subdivision, 2 lots. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Matched fields
- address
- 21&31 PARK BLVD
- application_address
- 21 PARK BLVD
220 Lake Promenade · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
23 134682 WET 03 SB · submitted 17 April 2023 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM35573 (The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35573: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 134682 WET 03 SB at 220 Lake Promenade: Draft Plan of Subdivision, 2 lots. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Matched fields
- address
- 21&31 PARK BLVD
- application_address
- 21 PARK BLVD
Council and committee items naming this address
- 220, 230 and 240 Lake Promenade and 21 and 31 Park Boulevard - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions2025.CC32.20 · 24 July 2025
- 220, 230 and 240 Lake Promenade and 21 and 31 Park Boulevard - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Appeal Report2024.EY18.7 · 2 December 2024
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.