Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 23 134668 WET 03 OZ

21 Park Blvd; 31 Park Blvd; 220 Lake Promenade; 230 Lake Promenade; 240 Lake Promenade

Ward 3 · Amber MorleyDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Appeal; In progress
Submitted: 17 April 2023; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 8; 4 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 21 Park Blvd; 31 Park Blvd; 220 Lake Promenade; 230 Lake Promenade; 240 Lake Promenade
Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted: 17 April 2023
Status: OMB Appeal
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The proposed Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion applications would provide for the phased demolition of the five existing 7-storey rental apartment buildings on the subject site, and would allow for the construction of a total of five new residential apartment buildings with heights ranging from 12 to 30 storeys, including two rental buildings and three condominium buildings.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy · registration SM35573
Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM35573: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 134668 WET 03 OZ at 31 Park Blvd: The proposed Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion applications would provide for the phased demolition of the five existing 7-storey rental apartment buildings on the subject site, and would allow for the constructi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Matched fields
address
21&31 PARK BLVD
application_address
21 PARK BLVD
The Lake Promenade Co-Tenancy · registration SM34641
Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34641: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 134668 WET 03 OZ at 31 Park Blvd: The proposed Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion applications would provide for the phased demolition of the five existing 7-storey rental apartment buildings on the subject site, and would allow for the constructi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications supporting proposed site at 220, 230 & 240 Lake Promenade and 21 & 31 Park Boulevard.
Matched fields
address
21&31 PARK BLVD
application_address
21 PARK BLVD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 8 communications · 4 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Amber Morley	Councillor staff	6	2	4 July 2024
Amber Morley	Member of council	2	2	4 July 2024

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Compten Management Inc.
SM23405 · 2 August 2016 · “31 Park Blvd.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3

37 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied16%
Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3: 37 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 25 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	37	—	100% (n=4)	0%	16%	0.27
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	15%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.