Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 22 177003 ESC 20 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 14 July 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 2201 Kingston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 14 July 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 190 units
- Related file
- 18 146662 ESC 36 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Condominium for 190 residential units. 12 storey residential mixed use condo with 190 units and 3 levels of underground parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Lifestyle Custom Homes Inc. · registration SM33717
Approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application for a service, grant, planning approval, permit or other license or permission - 2201 Kingston Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33717: Approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application for a service, grant, planning approval, permit or other license or permission - 2201 Kingston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 177003 ESC 20 CD at 2201 Kingston Rd: Draft Plan of Condominium for 190 residential units. 12 storey residential mixed use condo with 190 units and 3 levels of underground parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: … conditions, or denying an application for a service, grant, planning approval, permit or other license or permission - 2201 Kingston Road
Matched fields
- address
- 2201 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 2201 KINGSTON RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Crawford | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 30 May 2023 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Lifestyle Custom Homes Inc.SM33523 · 17 August 2022 · “2201 Kingston Rd”
- Lifestyle Custom Homes Inc.SM30734 · 20 October 2020 · “2201 Kingston Rd”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.