Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
2201 Kingston Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.70332, -79.25281
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Crawford | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 30 May 2023 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33717 | Lifestyle Custom Homes Inc. | 2201 Kingston Road | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 22 September 2022 – 24 March 2025 | 1 |
| SM33523 | Lifestyle Custom Homes Inc. | 2201 Kingston Rd | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development App… | 17 August 2022 – 31 December 2023 | 0 |
| SM30734 | Lifestyle Custom Homes Inc. | 2201 Kingston Rd | Building Permits; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development App… | 20 October 2020 – 31 December 2022 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 14 July 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 177003 ESC 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 7 March 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0058/22SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 16 June 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0127/20SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 6 June 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0160/19SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 14 May 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4571186Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 20 April 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 146662 ESC 36 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 177003 ESC 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 14 July 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0058/22SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 7 March 2022 | Closed Approved |
| A0127/20SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 16 June 2020 | Closed Approved |
| A0160/19SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 June 2019 | Closed Approved |
| COA-4571186 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 May 2019 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| 18 146662 ESC 36 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 April 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2201 Kingston Rd · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
22 177003 ESC 20 CD · submitted 14 July 2022 · Closed · from registration SM33717 (Lifestyle Custom Homes Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33717: Approving, approving with conditions, or denying an application for a service, grant, planning approval, permit or other license or permission - 2201 Kingston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 177003 ESC 20 CD at 2201 Kingston Rd: Draft Plan of Condominium for 190 residential units. 12 storey residential mixed use condo with 190 units and 3 levels of underground parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: … conditions, or denying an application for a service, grant, planning approval, permit or other license or permission - 2201 Kingston Road
Matched fields
- address
- 2201 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 2201 KINGSTON RD
2201 Kingston Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 146662 ESC 36 SA · submitted 20 April 2018 · Closed · from registration SM30734 (Lifestyle Custom Homes Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30734: 2201 Kingston RdScarborough, ON M1N 1T7 Lobbying city officials for the purposes of constructing housing in the city of Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 146662 ESC 36 SA at 2201 Kingston Rd: Proposed 12-storey mixed-use building with 190 residential units and commercial space on the ground floor. The proposed total GFA is 13,598 m² with a density of 5.64 FSI. A total of 178 vehicular parking spaces are proposed within a lower ground level and a three storey underground parking structur… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2201 Kingston RdScarborough, ON M1N 1T7 Lobbying city officials for the purposes of constructing housing in the city of Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 2201 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 2201 KINGSTON RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 20
9 lobbied · 295 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 295 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.