Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 139336 ESC 20 SA
2823 Eglinton Ave E; 2829 Eglinton Ave E
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 27 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2823 Eglinton Ave E; 2829 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 27 April 2022
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 169 units; 920 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 22 139337 ESC 20 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approval for a proposed 13-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 920 square metres, and a residential gross floor 14850 square metres. 169 dwelling units are proposed.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Watermill Management Ltd. · registration SM33216
2829 Eglinton Avenue East - Community engagement services in connection with a Zoning By-law Amendment application and Site Plan Approval application.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.97
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33216: 2829 Eglinton Avenue East - Community engagement services in connection with a Zoning By-law Amendment application and Site Plan Approval application. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 139336 ESC 20 SA at 2823 Eglinton Ave E: Site Plan Approval for a proposed 13-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 920 square metres, and a residential gross floor 14850 square metres. 169 dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2829 Eglinton Avenue East - Community engagement services in connection with a Zoning By-law Amendment application and Site Plan Approval applica…
Matched fields
- address
- 2829 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 2829 EGLINTON AVE E
2872136 Ontario Inc. · registration SM33053
Development Applications (Rezoning and Site Plan Approval) for 2829 Eglinton Ave East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33053: Development Applications (Rezoning and Site Plan Approval) for 2829 Eglinton Ave East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 139336 ESC 20 SA at 2823 Eglinton Ave E: Site Plan Approval for a proposed 13-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 920 square metres, and a residential gross floor 14850 square metres. 169 dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development Applications (Rezoning and Site Plan Approval) for 2829 Eglinton Ave East
Matched fields
- address
- 2829 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 2829 EGLINTON AVE E
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 26 communications · 5 meetings · 8 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 9 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parthi Kandavel | Member of council | 8 | 2 | 27 May 2025 |
| Michael Thompson | Member of council | 5 | 0 | 26 June 2025 |
| Gary Crawford | Councillor staff | 3 | 1 | 13 April 2022 |
| Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 5 May 2022 |
| Paul Ainslie | Member of council | 3 | 0 | 18 June 2025 |
| Jamaal Myers | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 28 May 2025 |
| Nick Mantas | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 28 May 2025 |
| Olivia Chow | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 20 May 2025 |
| Parthi Kandavel | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 22 April 2025 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 2872136 Ontario Inc.SM33073 · 18 March 2022 · “2829 Eglinton Avenue East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 20
11 lobbied · 34 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 34 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.