Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 22 127124 NNY 16 SA

Ward 16 · Jon BurnsideDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 25 March 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 11; 5 meetings · 5 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 48 Grenoble Dr
Ward: Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Submitted: 25 March 2022
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 993 units; 67,941 m² gross floor area
Related file: 22 127125 NNY 16 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for development includes 43- and 41-storey towers connected by a 6 storey podium, with on-site parkland dedication and a privately-owned publicly-accessible space. The towers and podium contain 993 residential units, comprised of 109 replacement rental units and 884 newresidential units. Total GFA is 67,941 m², resulting in a density (FSI) of 10.1 times the area of the lot. Zoning By-law 149-2024 passed on February 7, 2024. Last contact from applicant February 2, 2024

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Microbjo Properties Inc. · registration SM35510
Approval conditions for 48 Grenoble Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35510: Approval conditions for 48 Grenoble Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 127124 NNY 16 SA at 48 Grenoble Dr: Proposal for development includes 43- and 41-storey towers connected by a 6 storey podium, with on-site parkland dedication and a privately-owned publicly-accessible space. The towers and podium contain 993 residential units, comprised of 109 replacement rental units and 884 newresidential units. T… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Approval conditions for 48 Grenoble Drive
Matched fields
address
48 GRENOBLE DR
application_address
48 GRENOBLE DR
Microbjo Properties Inc. · registration SM35000
Re-development of 48 Grenoble Drive, inclusive of full rental replacement
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35000: Re-development of 48 Grenoble Drive, inclusive of full rental replacement (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 127124 NNY 16 SA at 48 Grenoble Dr: Proposal for development includes 43- and 41-storey towers connected by a 6 storey podium, with on-site parkland dedication and a privately-owned publicly-accessible space. The towers and podium contain 993 residential units, comprised of 109 replacement rental units and 884 newresidential units. T… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Re-development of 48 Grenoble Drive, inclusive of full rental replacement
Matched fields
address
48 GRENOBLE DR
application_address
48 GRENOBLE DR

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 11 communications · 5 meetings · 5 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Data table· 7 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Chris Moise	Councillor staff	2	2	17 April 2024
Gord Perks	Member of council	2	1	17 April 2024
Jon Burnside	Councillor staff	2	0	16 May 2024
Josh Matlow	Councillor staff	2	2	17 April 2024
Gord Perks	Councillor staff	1	0	16 April 2024
Jon Burnside	Member of council	1	0	8 November 2023
Olivia Chow	Councillor staff	1	0	16 April 2024

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Downe Dewdney Consulting Services Corporation2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Tenblock Developments
SM35533 · 23 April 2024 · “48 Grenoble Dr”
Tenblock
SM32813 · 13 January 2022 · “48 Grenoble Drive”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16

10 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16: 10 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.