Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
48 Grenoble Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
- Location
- 43.71677, -79.33131
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 11 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon Burnside | Councillor staff | 54 | 10 | 16 May 2024 |
| Jon Burnside | Member of council | 6 | 2 | 8 November 2023 |
| Ward 16 Don Valley East | Member of council | 5 | 2 | 8 June 2022 |
| Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong | Councillor staff | 4 | 2 | 8 June 2022 |
| Gord Perks | Member of council | 4 | 2 | 3 September 2024 |
| Environment and Climate | City staff | 2 | 2 | 12 July 2024 |
| Chris Moise | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 17 April 2024 |
| Gord Perks | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 3 September 2024 |
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 17 April 2024 |
| Lily Cheng | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 19 October 2023 |
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 16 April 2024 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35533 | Tenblock Developments | 48 Grenoble Dr | Environment; Parks / Open Space; Planning and Development | 23 April 2024 – 31 December 2024 | 5 |
| SM35510 | Microbjo Properties Inc. | 48 Grenoble Drive | Planning and Development; Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion | 16 April 2024 – 21 August 2024 | 10 |
| SM35000 | Microbjo Properties Inc. | 48 Grenoble Drive | Planning and Development, Rental Housing Demolition or Conversion; Planning and Development Applica… | 7 November 2023 – 10 November 2023 | 1 |
| SM32813 | Tenblock | 48 Grenoble Drive | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 13 January 2022 – 31 December 2024 | 68 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 25 March 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 127124 NNY 16 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 25 March 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 127125 NNY 16 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 127124 NNY 16 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 March 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 127125 NNY 16 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 March 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
48 Grenoble Dr · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 127124 NNY 16 SA · submitted 25 March 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM35000 (Microbjo Properties Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35000: Re-development of 48 Grenoble Drive, inclusive of full rental replacement (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 127124 NNY 16 SA at 48 Grenoble Dr: Proposal for development includes 43- and 41-storey towers connected by a 6 storey podium, with on-site parkland dedication and a privately-owned publicly-accessible space. The towers and podium contain 993 residential units, comprised of 109 replacement rental units and 884 newresidential units. T… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Re-development of 48 Grenoble Drive, inclusive of full rental replacement
Matched fields
- address
- 48 GRENOBLE DR
- application_address
- 48 GRENOBLE DR
48 Grenoble Dr · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 127124 NNY 16 SA · submitted 25 March 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM35510 (Microbjo Properties Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35510: Approval conditions for 48 Grenoble Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 127124 NNY 16 SA at 48 Grenoble Dr: Proposal for development includes 43- and 41-storey towers connected by a 6 storey podium, with on-site parkland dedication and a privately-owned publicly-accessible space. The towers and podium contain 993 residential units, comprised of 109 replacement rental units and 884 newresidential units. T… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Approval conditions for 48 Grenoble Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 48 GRENOBLE DR
- application_address
- 48 GRENOBLE DR
Council and committee items naming this address
- 48 Grenoble Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Decision Report - Approval2023.NY8.10 · 17 October 2023
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16
10 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16
4 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.