Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 22 114259 STE 14 OZ

Ward 14 · Paula FletcherDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 15 February 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 5; 2 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1095 Danforth Ave; 1111 Danforth Ave
Ward: Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
Submitted: 15 February 2022
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 270 units; 17,794 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a 13-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 719.1 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 17794.4 square metres. 270 rental dwelling units are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

1095- 1111 Danforth Project GP Inc. · registration SM32923
Lobbying on behalf of proposed development application at 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32923: Lobbying on behalf of proposed development application at 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 114259 STE 14 OZ at 1095 Danforth Ave: Zoning By-law amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a 13-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 719.1 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 17794.4 square metres. 270 rental dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying on behalf of proposed development application at 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue
Matched fields
address
1095-1111 DANFORTH AVE
application_address
1095 DANFORTH AVE
Core Development Group Ltd. · registration SM32914
Planning application for 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32914: Planning application for 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 114259 STE 14 OZ at 1095 Danforth Ave: Zoning By-law amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a 13-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 719.1 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 17794.4 square metres. 270 rental dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application for 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue
Matched fields
address
1095-1111 DANFORTH AVE
application_address
1095 DANFORTH AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 5 communications · 2 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor Paula Fletcher2
Paula Fletcher2
Ward 14 Toronto-Danforth1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Paula Fletcher	Councillor staff	2	1	13 May 2022
Paula Fletcher	Councillor staff	2	0	23 September 2022
Ward 14 Toronto-Danforth	Member of council	1	1	13 May 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amir Remtulla and Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14

18 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14: 18 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 14 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	18	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	28	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.