Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
1095 Danforth Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.68066, -79.33477
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 3 November 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0812/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 7 October 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 222710 STE 14 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 March 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 126374 STE 14 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 15 February 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 114259 STE 14 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0812/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 3 November 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 24 222710 STE 14 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 October 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 22 126374 STE 14 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 March 2022 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 22 114259 STE 14 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 15 February 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1111 Danforth Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 126374 STE 14 SA · submitted 24 March 2022 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM32923 (1095- 1111 Danforth Project GP Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32923: Lobbying on behalf of proposed development application at 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 126374 STE 14 SA at 1111 Danforth Ave: Site Plan Control application to permit a 13-storey mixed-use building with 297 purpose-built residential rental units and 1,646 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying on behalf of proposed development application at 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 1095-1111 DANFORTH AVE
- application_address
- 1095 DANFORTH AVE
1095 Danforth Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 114259 STE 14 OZ · submitted 15 February 2022 · Closed · from registration SM32914 (Core Development Group Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32914: Planning application for 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 114259 STE 14 OZ at 1095 Danforth Ave: Zoning By-law amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a 13-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 719.1 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 17794.4 square metres. 270 rental dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application for 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 1095-1111 DANFORTH AVE
- application_address
- 1095 DANFORTH AVE
1095 Danforth Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 114259 STE 14 OZ · submitted 15 February 2022 · Closed · from registration SM32923 (1095- 1111 Danforth Project GP Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.96
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32923: Lobbying on behalf of proposed development application at 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 114259 STE 14 OZ at 1095 Danforth Ave: Zoning By-law amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for a 13-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 719.1 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 17794.4 square metres. 270 rental dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying on behalf of proposed development application at 1095-1111 Danforth Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 1095-1111 DANFORTH AVE
- application_address
- 1095 DANFORTH AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 14
4 lobbied · 69 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14
18 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.