Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 249603 STE 10 OZ
16 Oxley St; 101 Spadina Ave; 105 Spadina Ave; 363 Adelaide St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 17 December 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 16 Oxley St; 101 Spadina Ave; 105 Spadina Ave; 363 Adelaide St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 17 December 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 375 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning By-law Amendment Application to permit the redevelopment of the site with a 39-storey plus mechanical penthouse mixed-use building with a total height of 133.95 metres. The total proposed gross floor area equals 27,253 square metres including 194 square metres of ground floor retail and 375 residential units above. A new City park measuring 1,000 square metres is proposed on the northern portion of the site with a public parking garage beneath. This file is being reviewed in conjunction with Site Plan Approval application, File No 21-249606 STE 10 SA.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
DevGreat Inc. · registration SM34674
101-105 Spadina Ave
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34674: 101-105 Spadina Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 249603 STE 10 OZ at 16 Oxley St: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to permit the redevelopment of the site with a 39-storey plus mechanical penthouse mixed-use building with a total height of 133.95 metres. The total proposed gross floor area equals 27,253 square metres including 194 square metres of ground floor retail and 375 … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 101-105 Spadina Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 101-105 SPADINA AVE
- application_address
- 101 SPADINA AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CreateTO | Local board | 1 | 0 | 15 September 2023 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 355 Adelaide Nominee IncSM36147 · 25 November 2024 · “16 Oxley Street”
- 355 Adelaide Nominee IncSM36152 · 25 November 2024 · “16 Oxley Street”
- Great Gulf Group of CompaniesSM27744 · 28 February 2019 · “101 Spadina Ave”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.