Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
16 Oxley St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64656, -79.39450
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development Review | City staff | 9 | 0 | 5 September 2025 |
| TTC | Local board | 3 | 0 | 1 August 2025 |
| Corporate Real Estate Management | City staff | 1 | 1 | 10 March 2025 |
| CreateTO | Local board | 1 | 1 | 10 March 2025 |
| Toronto Parking Authority | Local board | 1 | 0 | 6 March 2025 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36147 | 355 Adelaide Nominee Inc | 16 Oxley Street | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 25 November 2024 – 25 November 2026 | 0 |
| SM36152 | 355 Adelaide Nominee Inc | 16 Oxley Street | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Applicatio… | 25 November 2024 – 7 April 2026 | 15 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 17 December 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 249603 STE 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 230436 STE 10 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 26 June 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 160837 STE 10 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 249603 STE 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 December 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 230436 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 25 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 160837 STE 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 June 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
16 Oxley St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 249603 STE 10 OZ · submitted 17 December 2021 · Closed · from registration SM34674 (DevGreat Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM34674: 101-105 Spadina Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 249603 STE 10 OZ at 16 Oxley St: Zoning By-law Amendment Application to permit the redevelopment of the site with a 39-storey plus mechanical penthouse mixed-use building with a total height of 133.95 metres. The total proposed gross floor area equals 27,253 square metres including 194 square metres of ground floor retail and 375 … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 101-105 Spadina Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 101-105 SPADINA AVE
- application_address
- 101 SPADINA AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.