Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 21 233474 STE 13 CD
191 Church St; 193 Church St; 195 Church St; 197 Church St; 199 Church St; 201 Church St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 3 November 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 191 Church St; 193 Church St; 195 Church St; 197 Church St; 199 Church St; 201 Church St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 3 November 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 484 units
- Related file
- 19 114180 STE 13 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Condominium for 484 units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
CentreCourt · registration SM28218
201 Church Street Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28218: 201 Church Street Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 233474 STE 13 CD at 193 Church St: Draft Plan of Condominium for 484 units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 201 Church Street Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 201 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 201 CHURCH ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 4 communications · 4 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyn Wong-Tam Ward 13 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 2 February 2021 |
| Ward 13 Toronto Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 2 February 2021 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- CentreCourtSM27024 · 16 November 2018 · “201 Church Street”
- Church Street Limited PartnershipSM26901 · 26 October 2018 · “201 Church Street.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.