Address
201 Church St
About this address
- Ward
- — (address points for this address fall in more than one ward)
- Location
- 43.70833, -79.50887
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyn Wong-Tam Ward 13 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 2 February 2021 |
| Ward 13 Toronto Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 2 February 2021 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM28218 | CentreCourt | 201 Church Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 1 April 2019 – 24 August 2026 | 4 |
| SM27024 | CentreCourt | 201 Church Street | Building Permits; Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application, Site Pl… | 16 November 2018 – 31 December 2021 | 0 |
| SM26901 | Church Street Limited Partnership | 201 Church Street. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 26 October 2018 – 28 October 2026 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 15 November 2022Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0080/22TEYConditional Consent · Approved
- Submitted 3 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 233474 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 December 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 265558 STE 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 February 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 114180 STE 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0080/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 15 November 2022 | Conditional Consent Approved |
| 21 233474 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 3 November 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 265558 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 December 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 114180 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 February 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
193 Church St · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
21 233474 STE 13 CD · submitted 3 November 2021 · Closed · from registration SM28218 (CentreCourt)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28218: 201 Church Street Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 233474 STE 13 CD at 193 Church St: Draft Plan of Condominium for 484 units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 201 Church Street Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 201 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 201 CHURCH ST
193 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 114180 STE 13 OZ · submitted 11 February 2019 · Closed · from registration SM26901 (Church Street Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26901: Assisting with the development of 201 Church Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 114180 STE 13 OZ at 193 Church St: Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 39-storey building consisting of 484 dwelling units. It is proposed that seven percent of the buildings floor area will be allocated to affordable units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 201 Church Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 201 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 201 CHURCH ST
193 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 114180 STE 13 OZ · submitted 11 February 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28218 (CentreCourt)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28218: 201 Church Street Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 114180 STE 13 OZ at 193 Church St: Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 39-storey building consisting of 484 dwelling units. It is proposed that seven percent of the buildings floor area will be allocated to affordable units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 201 Church Street Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 201 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 201 CHURCH ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.