Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)

Development application 21 219445 STE 12 SB

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 29 September 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 4; 0 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Addresses: 2323 Yonge St; 2329 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 29 September 2021
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 24 166703 STE 12 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft plan of subdivision for 3 development blocks.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

RioCan REIT · registration SM34102
2323-2329 Yonge Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34102: 2323-2329 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 219445 STE 12 SB at 2323 Yonge St: Draft plan of subdivision for 3 development blocks. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2323-2329 Yonge Street
Matched fields
address
2323-2329 YONGE ST
application_address
2323 YONGE ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 4 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Development Review4

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Development Review	City staff	4	0	15 January 2025

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amir Remtulla and Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Pheonix Yonge Street LP
SM36886 · 18 August 2025 · “2323 Yonge Street”
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust
SM29816 · 25 February 2020 · “2323 Yonge Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 12

1 lobbied · 12 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 12: 1 lobbied and 12 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.