Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 199866 STE 12 OZ
91 Raglan Ave; 93 Raglan Ave; 95 Raglan Ave; 97 Raglan Ave; 99 Raglan Ave; 101 Raglan Ave
- Status
- Council Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 17 August 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 91 Raglan Ave; 93 Raglan Ave; 95 Raglan Ave; 97 Raglan Ave; 99 Raglan Ave; 101 Raglan Ave
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 17 August 2021
- Status
- Council Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the development of the site for a 26-storey residential building atop a 6-storey podium element.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Camrost-Felcorp · registration SM34728
Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands municipally identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34728: Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands municipally identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 199866 STE 12 OZ at 91 Raglan Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the development of the site for a 26-storey residential building atop a 6-storey podium element. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands municipally identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 63-85 RAGLAN AVE
- application_address
- 91 RAGLAN AVE
Camrost-Felcorp · registration SM30400
Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30400: Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 199866 STE 12 OZ at 91 Raglan Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the development of the site for a 26-storey residential building atop a 6-storey podium element. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 63-85 RAGLAN AVE
- application_address
- 91 RAGLAN AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 29 July 2020 |
| Josh Matlow | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 December 2024 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Camrost-FelcorpSM33393 · 22 June 2022 · “91 Raglan Ave”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.