Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
91 Raglan Ave
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.68579, -79.42048
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33393 | Camrost-Felcorp | 91 Raglan Ave | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 22 June 2022 – 31 December 2023 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 18 February 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0131/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 February 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5583842Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 16 September 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 213475 STE 12 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 17 August 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 199866 STE 12 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
- Submitted 9 March 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 125200 STE 21 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0131/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 February 2025 | Closed Approved |
| COA-5583842 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 18 February 2025 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| 21 213475 STE 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 16 September 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 199866 STE 12 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 August 2021 | Council Approved Approved |
| 15 125200 STE 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 March 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
91 Raglan Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 199866 STE 12 OZ · submitted 17 August 2021 · Council Approved · from registration SM30400 (Camrost-Felcorp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30400: Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 199866 STE 12 OZ at 91 Raglan Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the development of the site for a 26-storey residential building atop a 6-storey podium element. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 63-85 RAGLAN AVE
- application_address
- 91 RAGLAN AVE
91 Raglan Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 199866 STE 12 OZ · submitted 17 August 2021 · Council Approved · from registration SM34728 (Camrost-Felcorp)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34728: Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands municipally identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 199866 STE 12 OZ at 91 Raglan Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the development of the site for a 26-storey residential building atop a 6-storey podium element. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands municipally identified as 63-85 Raglan Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 63-85 RAGLAN AVE
- application_address
- 91 RAGLAN AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.