lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 196125 STE 19 SA

10 Dawes Rd; 10A Dawes Rd; 12 Dawes Rd; 18 Dawes Rd; 20 Dawes Rd; 30 Dawes Rd

Status
NOAC Issued
Approved
Submitted
10 August 2021
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
9
8 meetings · 4 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
10 Dawes Rd; 10A Dawes Rd; 12 Dawes Rd; 18 Dawes Rd; 20 Dawes Rd; 30 Dawes Rd
Ward
Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
Submitted
10 August 2021
Status
NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
636 units; 40,408 m² gross floor area
Related file
19 124138 STE 19 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval for two mixed-use towers having heights of 24 and 38-storeys, and having a residential gross floor area of 40,408 square metres, and a non-residential gross floor area of 2670 square metres. A total of 636 residential dwelling units are proposed.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 9 communications · 8 meetings · 4 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 19 Beaches-East York4
  • Ward 192
  • ward 192
  • Member of Council - Brad Bradford1
Data table· 4 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 19 Beaches-East YorkMember of council4427 May 2021
Ward 19Councillor staff2227 May 2021
ward 19Councillor staff2216 December 2019
Member of Council - Brad BradfordCouncillor staff103 November 2020

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19

6 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19: 6 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied28Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.