Address · Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
20 Dawes Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Location
- 43.68830, -79.29714
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 10 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 196125 STE 19 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 11 March 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 124138 STE 19 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 196125 STE 19 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 August 2021 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 19 124138 STE 19 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 March 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
10 Dawes Rd · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 196125 STE 19 SA · submitted 10 August 2021 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM29470 (Marlin Spring Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29470: Planning application with respect to the development of 10-30 Dawes Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 196125 STE 19 SA at 10 Dawes Rd: Site Plan Approval for two mixed-use towers having heights of 24 and 38-storeys, and having a residential gross floor area of 40,408 square metres, and a non-residential gross floor area of 2670 square metres. A total of 636 residential dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application with respect to the development of 10-30 Dawes Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 10-30 DAWES RD
- application_address
- 10 DAWES RD
10 A Dawes Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 124138 STE 19 OZ · submitted 11 March 2019 · Closed · from registration SM29470 (Marlin Spring Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM29470: Planning application with respect to the development of 10-30 Dawes Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 124138 STE 19 OZ at 10 A Dawes Rd: Zoning By-Law Amendment to permit two residential towers including a 26-storey (84.0 metres excluding mechanical penthouse) and a 33-storey (104.54 metres excluding mechanical penthouse) atop a shared 7 storey mixed-use podium (25.7 metres) containing residential, commercial/office, retail, and day… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application with respect to the development of 10-30 Dawes Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 10-30 DAWES RD
- application_address
- 10A DAWES RD
10 A Dawes Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 124138 STE 19 OZ · submitted 11 March 2019 · Closed · from registration SM30022 (Minto Communities Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30022: Redevelopment of 9-25 Dawes Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 124138 STE 19 OZ at 10 A Dawes Rd: Zoning By-Law Amendment to permit two residential towers including a 26-storey (84.0 metres excluding mechanical penthouse) and a 33-storey (104.54 metres excluding mechanical penthouse) atop a shared 7 storey mixed-use podium (25.7 metres) containing residential, commercial/office, retail, and day… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 9-25 Dawes Road
Matched fields
- address
- 9-25 DAWES RD
- application_address
- 10A DAWES RD
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19
6 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19
7 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.