Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 21 184321 STE 10 SB
41 Widmer St; 59 Widmer St; 126 John St; 132 John St; 142 John St; 259 Richmond St W; 261 Richmond St W; 263 Richmond St W; 267 Richmond St W
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 14 July 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 41 Widmer St; 59 Widmer St; 126 John St; 132 John St; 142 John St; 259 Richmond St W; 261 Richmond St W; 263 Richmond St W; 267 Richmond St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 14 July 2021
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 19 144266 STE 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
—
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Festival Hall Developments Limited · registration SM27361
Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27361: Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 184321 STE 10 SB at 126 John St: (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 142 JOHN ST
- application_address
- 142 JOHN ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- RioCanSM27728 · 12 February 2019 · “126 John Street”
- RioCan REITSM27625 · 8 February 2019 · “126 John St.”
- RioCan Real Estate Investment TrustSM27390 · 22 January 2019 · “142 John St.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.