Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
142 John St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64871, -79.39090
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 12 February 2019 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27390 | RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust | 142 John St. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 22 January 2019 – 31 December 2024 | 2 |
| SM27361 | Festival Hall Developments Limited | 142 John St. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 15 January 2019 – 15 January 2027 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 14 July 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 184321 STE 10 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 24 April 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 144266 STE 10 OZAppeal Received · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 184321 STE 10 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 14 July 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 144266 STE 10 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 April 2019 | Appeal Received In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
126 John St · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
21 184321 STE 10 SB · submitted 14 July 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM27361 (Festival Hall Developments Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27361: Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 184321 STE 10 SB at 126 John St: (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 142 JOHN ST
- application_address
- 142 JOHN ST
132 John St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 144266 STE 10 OZ · submitted 24 April 2019 · Appeal Received · from registration SM27361 (Festival Hall Developments Limited)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.97
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27361: Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 144266 STE 10 OZ at 132 John St: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development including two buildings, 37 and 42 storeys in height (131.0 metres and 145.2 metres, respectively, including mechanical penthouses). Proposed uses include two levels of retail, seven levels of office space, a daycare, the replace… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development application at 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 142 JOHN ST
- application_address
- 142 JOHN ST
132 John St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 144266 STE 10 OZ · submitted 24 April 2019 · Appeal Received · from registration SM27390 (RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27390: RioCan Hall - 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 144266 STE 10 OZ at 132 John St: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development including two buildings, 37 and 42 storeys in height (131.0 metres and 145.2 metres, respectively, including mechanical penthouses). Proposed uses include two levels of retail, seven levels of office space, a daycare, the replace… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: RioCan Hall - 126, 132, 142 John St. & 259, 261, 263 & 267 Richmond St. W.
Matched fields
- address
- 142 JOHN ST
- application_address
- 142 JOHN ST
132 John St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 144266 STE 10 OZ · submitted 24 April 2019 · Appeal Received · from registration SM27625 (RioCan REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27625: Application for site redevelopment at the corner of John St. and Richmond in downtown Toronto. Address: 126 John St. Toronto, ON M5V 2E3 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 144266 STE 10 OZ at 132 John St: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development including two buildings, 37 and 42 storeys in height (131.0 metres and 145.2 metres, respectively, including mechanical penthouses). Proposed uses include two levels of retail, seven levels of office space, a daycare, the replace… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application for site redevelopment at the corner of John St. and Richmond in downtown Toronto. Address: 126 John St. Toronto, ON M5V 2E3
Matched fields
- address
- 126 JOHN ST
- application_address
- 126 JOHN ST
132 John St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 144266 STE 10 OZ · submitted 24 April 2019 · Appeal Received · from registration SM27728 (RioCan)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27728: Planning and Development for RioCan Hall; John & Richmond (126 John Street) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 144266 STE 10 OZ at 132 John St: Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development including two buildings, 37 and 42 storeys in height (131.0 metres and 145.2 metres, respectively, including mechanical penthouses). Proposed uses include two levels of retail, seven levels of office space, a daycare, the replace… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Development for RioCan Hall; John & Richmond (126 John Street)
Matched fields
- address
- 126 JOHN ST
- application_address
- 126 JOHN ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 10
1 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.