lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 21 166739 ESC 21 OZ

1020 Birchmount Rd; 1030 Birchmount Rd; 2200 Eglinton Ave E; 2200-2206 Eglinton Avenue East

Status
OMB Approved
Approved
Submitted
7 June 2021
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
1020 Birchmount Rd; 1030 Birchmount Rd; 2200 Eglinton Ave E; 2200-2206 Eglinton Avenue East
Ward
Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Submitted
7 June 2021
Status
OMB Approved
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes
Size stated in the description
2,363 units; 213,314 m² gross floor area
Related file
18 206702 ESC 37 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment application for a mixed-use development on 4 blocks (1, 5, 7 & 10), with a total gross floor area of 213,314 sq. m (195,558 sq. m for residential uses; 1,743 sq. m of retail uses; and 16,013 sq. m of new and existing office uses), 2,363 residential units, and 1,834 parking spaces. The application is part of a master plan for the lands at 2200-2206 Eglinton Ave E, 1020-1030 Birchmount Rd and 75 Thermos Rd (Official Plan Amendment Application No. 18 206702 ESC 37 OZ). Block 1 would consist of a 2-storey addition to the existing office building at 2206 Eglinton Ave E. Block 5 would consist of two tall buildings with heights that range from 37 to 46 storeys. Block 7 would consist of a 30-storey building. Block 10 would consist of a tall building with a height that ranges from 20 to 30 storeys and 17 2-storey townhouses.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21

15 lobbied · 21 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21: 15 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied15Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied21Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.