Address · Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
1020 Birchmount Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
- Location
- 43.73141, -79.27915
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 26 May 2016 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23165 | Dream Unlimited Corporation | 1020 Birchmount Rd. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 26 May 2016 – 26 November 2018 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 7 June 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 166739 ESC 21 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 10 June 2020Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 20 154640 ESC 21 SBOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 9 August 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 206702 ESC 37 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 166739 ESC 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 June 2021 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 20 154640 ESC 21 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 10 June 2020 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 18 206702 ESC 37 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 August 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1030 Birchmount Rd · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
20 154640 ESC 21 SB · submitted 10 June 2020 · OMB Approved · from registration SM28824 (Dream Office REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28824: Development application for 2200 Eglinton Avenue East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 154640 ESC 21 SB at 1030 Birchmount Rd: Draft Plan of Subdivision application to create 7 development blocks, including 2 public park blocks, and new streets on the site at 2200-2206 Eglinton Ave E, 1020-1030 Birchmount Rd and 75 Thermos Rd (Dream Lands). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for 2200 Eglinton Avenue East.
Matched fields
- address
- 2200 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 2200 EGLINTON AVE E
2200-2206 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 206702 ESC 37 OZ · submitted 9 August 2018 · Closed · from registration SM26186 (Dream Asset Management Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26186: Planning and Development Application for Official Plan Amendment and applicable municipal policies, bylaws and regulations for 2200-2206 Eglinton Avenue East, Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 206702 ESC 37 OZ at 2200-2206 Eglinton Ave E: Official Plan Amendment application to add new policies to the Official Plan for the subject site. The SASP would permit future mixed-use development, new public streets and parks. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing office building at 2206 Eglinton Ave E and the existing (east) above… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …g and Development Application for Official Plan Amendment and applicable municipal policies, bylaws and regulations for 2200-2206 Eglinton Avenue East, Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 2200-2206 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 2200-2206 EGLINTON AVE E
2200-2206 Eglinton Ave E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 206702 ESC 37 OZ · submitted 9 August 2018 · Closed · from registration SM28824 (Dream Office REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28824: Development application for 2200 Eglinton Avenue East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 206702 ESC 37 OZ at 2200-2206 Eglinton Ave E: Official Plan Amendment application to add new policies to the Official Plan for the subject site. The SASP would permit future mixed-use development, new public streets and parks. The applicant is proposing to retain the existing office building at 2206 Eglinton Ave E and the existing (east) above… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development application for 2200 Eglinton Avenue East.
Matched fields
- address
- 2200 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 2200-2206 EGLINTON AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21
15 lobbied · 21 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 21
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.