Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 147244 NNY 15 SA

1710 Bayview Ave; 1712 Bayview Ave; 1714 Bayview Ave; 1716 Bayview Ave; 1718 Bayview Ave; 1720 Bayview Ave; 1722 Bayview Ave; 1724 Bayview Ave; 1726 Bayview Ave; 1728 Bayview Ave; 1730 Bayview Ave; 1732 Bayview Ave; 1734 Bayview Ave; 1736 Bayview Ave

Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos LinDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 28 April 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 0 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 1710 Bayview Ave; 1712 Bayview Ave; 1714 Bayview Ave; 1716 Bayview Ave; 1718 Bayview Ave; 1720 Bayview Ave; 1722 Bayview Ave; 1724 Bayview Ave; 1726 Bayview Ave; 1728 Bayview Ave; 1730 Bayview Ave; 1732 Bayview Ave; 1734 Bayview Ave; 1736 Bayview Ave
Ward: Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted: 28 April 2021
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 16,452 m² gross floor area
Related file: 20 153356 NNY 15 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Application submitted to permit a 9-storey, mid-rise, mixed-use development, containing 197 apartment units and groundfloor retail space. The proposed GFA is 16,452 sqm (16,020 sqm residential GFA and 432 sqm retail GFA). The SPA application is related to Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA) application 20 153356 NNY 15 OZ, both of which were appealed to the Ontario Land Tribula (OLT). The OLT approved the ZBA application in June 30, 2022 (refer to OLT file OLT-22002414 and PL 210295). The revised SPA application (June 2022) reflects the plan before the OLT.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Gairloch Ltd. · registration SM32556
Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 1718-1736 Bayview Ave
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32556: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 1718-1736 Bayview Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 147244 NNY 15 SA at 1710 Bayview Ave: Site Plan Application submitted to permit a 9-storey, mid-rise, mixed-use development, containing 197 apartment units and groundfloor retail space. The proposed GFA is 16,452 sqm (16,020 sqm residential GFA and 432 sqm retail GFA). The SPA application is related to Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA) app… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 1718-1736 Bayview Ave
Matched fields
address
1718-1736 BAYVIEW AVE
application_address
1718 BAYVIEW AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor Robinson1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Robinson	Councillor staff	1	0	9 November 2021

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

McCarthy Tetrault LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Toronto (Bayview and Eglinton) Limited Partnership
SM30080 · 14 May 2020 · “1718 Bayview Avenue.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15

12 lobbied · 41 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15: 12 lobbied and 41 matched unlobbied applications in 10 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	41	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.